development

UNESCO Community Radio Handbook

Submitted by tranquileye on Wed, 2006-05-03 11:36.

By Colin Fraser and Sonia Restrepo Estrada for UNESCO, 2001.

From introduction: here are more than 20,000 radio stations in the world and more than 2 billion radio receivers. Any notion that TV and other sophisticated communication technology will replace radio is unfounded, for radio is in constant expansion. Its waves reach almost every corner of our planet. It is the prime electronic medium of the poor because it leaps the barriers of isolation and illiteracy, and it is the most affordable electronic medium to broadcast and receive in... The last two decades have seen a rapid expansion in the number and popularity of community radio stations. Among the reasons for this are: the democratization and decentralization processes in many parts of the world; deregulation of the media and the relaxing of broadcasting monopolies by state institutions; and disaffection with commercial radio channels... To start a small radio station is not as complicated and expensive as many people think. There is enough experience in many countries to prove that it is within the reach of almost any community.

Community Radio for Change and Development

Submitted by tranquileye on Thu, 2006-04-27 11:00.

By Colin Fraser and Sonia Restrepo-Estrada. Development, v45/n4. 2002.

Abstract: Colin Fraser and Sonia Restrepo-Estrada illustrate the role of a radio station, owned and run by a community, in providing the forum for the participatory, public dialogue which is essential for social change. The radio station is a platform for identifying and analysing problems and their solutions, thereby determining development inputs that truly meet local needs. Open access to onair complaints from the audience can pressure local authorities to adopt practices of good governance and transparency. Cheap and easy to install and operate, community radio can also be the interface between poor communities and the Internet.

Is Community Radio an Effective Tool for Grassroots Development? A Case Study of Two Honduran NGOs

Submitted by tranquileye on Wed, 2005-11-09 19:18.

Masters Thesis, Philip Tamminga, School of Communications, Simon Fraser University, 1997.

Abstract: Is radio an effective medium for development? For years development theorists believed that mass media, particularly radio, were ideal instruments to bring 'development' to rural societies. Scores of projects in Latin America attempted to use radio for educational purposes, but for the most part, these experiments did not fully meet their development objectives.

This study assesses the potential of radio from a different perspective by examining the effectiveness of community-based radio as a component of 'grassroots' development processes. Radio programrning by two non-govemrnental organisations in Honduras is examined in detail: Radio San Miguel (RSM) in Marcala, and the Honduran Ecumenical Community Services Institute (INEHSCO) in Santa Rosa de Copan. RSM and INEHSCO are representative of a movement in Latin America towards community radio. The theoretical framework adopted here suggests that community radio challenges the monopoly of knowledge held by the dominant media and deveiopment model in Latin America, and under certain conditions it can be used successfully to support grassroots development initiatives. But the ongoing challenge faced by community radio is to transform social relations in society without internally replicating the hierarchies and inequities of that dominant model.

The study situates RSM and INEHSCO in Honduran society and assesses the effectiveness of their programming according to three main criteria: use of local language, culture and indigenous knowledge; participation of community members in programming; and impact of programming on audiences. Internal and external constraints that limit the effectiveness of RSM and INEHSCO are discussed as well. Research tools included interviews and focus group sessions and workshops with staff and community members of both organisations between 1992 and 1993. The research concludes that both organisations have been strikingly successful at utilising indigenous howledge and culture to produce radio programming that is sensitive to the development needs of their audiences. But in practice, contradictions of power and participation limited the effectiveness of RSM and INEHSCO in contributing to social change. Increased participation in planning and decision-making, well-organised and consistent programming content and better use of indigenous knowledge are required if RSM and INEHSCO are to effectively support grassroots development processes.