28
October 1999
The
end of Tiger Stadium.
The
comments
of the judge in the Laramie murder trial slightly alleive
that heavy feeling of helplessness and ennui so difficult
to shake after the morning news.
----------------------------------------
25
October 1999
Okay--
more information chat: Lots of people I know and
lots of people I don't know had lots of things to say about
the nature of information... The numbers don't really mean
anything. They are helping me ride a couple of trains of
thought simultaneously without crashing them into one another...
Although that might not be bad, either...
1.
I don't agree that the essence of information is that
it can reformatted or translated... I think there exist
messages that can accurately be communicated in only one
way (certain artworks?). And there are even more messages
that are best communicated in only one way (way more than
anyone would like to admit)... But all that does assume
that the universe is this sort of giant conduit
for the exchange of information (Boy, this conversation
got out of hand almost immediately). Is that simplistic?
[Tangent: I don't really think it's reductionist any more
than saying the universe is electrical or binary... It's
a nice, accurate assessment that lends itself to a lot
of extrapolation and it scales well... Hmm... Actually
it is reductionist, but I need to start somewhere, no?]
2.
A prompt from J to look into information theory:
" This
is a branch of science (or math) founded by claude shannon.
They have very clear definitions of information in information
theory (go figure) but even with clarity, the topic is
still hard to come to grips with. In info theory, information
is inversely proportional to someone's ability to predict
what is coming next. In other words: a given stream of
data has high information content if you can't predict
what is coming next in the data stream. So, a data stream
with every number in order from 1 to 10 contains (for
most people) no information (because you don't need to
hear what's coming next, everybody already knows, 1,2,3,4,5,6....)
The weird part is that something totally unpredictable
(like say the ravings of a schizophrenic) would contain
a lot of information. A random stream of data would contain
maximum information. Of course, if you look at information
this way, then you don't want maximum information, because
you can't make anything out of it. You want enough information
so that something new is conveyed, but not so much that
you drop off into unintelligibility."
Okay... this
fits in with the idea that the more ambiguous the data
(Is that the right word?), the greater the potential amount
of information... That makes information pretty much unquantifiable...
3.
One
last thought: Mitsu
talks about information being "fundamentally
context-dependent; it depends upon knowledge of the whole
system. Information involves the creation of a resonance
between different parts of a system..." and
references Gregory
Bateson.'s "difference that changes us"...
I went
to Coney
Island this weekend. None of the theme parks were open
and no one else got off the train at the last stop. There
was a high wind off the ocean and despite the cold, the
sky was very blue. Only the carousel was in operation and
shreds of the flattened music were audible as the wind shifted.
A deep scarlet is starting to wash over the ivy on the old
steel roller coaster where the vines face the sea.
----------------------------------------
21
October 1999
I
couldn't sleep last night thinking about the definition
of information. Information is not necessarily true. Veracity
is something different. Maybe that's the quality of a specific
piece of information? Fiction or artworks are information...
A different kind of information than a digestible blob of
textual or graphical information, but still information.
Perhaps the difference is in the way the user (what else
do I call her?) accesses the information, as well as in
the degree of ambiguity (intentional or otherwise) in the
substance of the message... Tangentially, reading more CHI-WEB
postings this morning, I find it shocking that the prevalent
definition of information there seems to imply that it must
be textual or, at best, a graphical representation of hard
data, otherwise it's "boring." What shortsightedness
and appalling snobbery... I started to dash of a scathing
letter, rife with all sorts of scintillating examples of
the sort of information conveyed by the much maligned "images
and sounds," but I ran out of steam pretty quickly
and thought I'd better do my work instead. I stopped bothering
to say that sort of thing on the list long ago because after
a while it just became too daunting to be greeted with such
a resounding ASCII silence... It's too much like exiting
a party at which I either stood silently by the stereo or
gazed with intense fascination into my beer for several
hours. I dutifully walk around the room and politely take
my leave of a lot of people who are gently surprised at
my existence.
----------------------------------------
19 October
1999
Following
a free association that started with NFPAOFU's
reminder of the new work by Kristeva,
I came accross this interesting paper
that uses Hannah
Arendt's "paradigm of the ideal types of the public
and private spheres" to discuss the political (social)
implications of cyberspace on political action.
I' m
reading The
Unconsoled...
And it's making me dizzy. It's really well written. The
writing is very... polite... That didn't sound like a compliment
but it was meant as one. I am primed for a satisfying dénouement...
I will find out this afternoon on the flight back to NYC,
where I can finally pile all my books on to the lovely shelving
that IKEA invented and Victor kindly installed for me. It's
very nifty shelving. The individual shelves appear to stick
to the wall solely by the will of a benevolent Providence.
I will
briefly use this public-ish forum to exorcise my incredible
frustration with the Chase online banking website. It is
just dreadful. Por ejemplo, if you click on the wrong
link (which is inevitable) it kicks you out of site without
logging you out so you can't get back in until your session
times out. Another time I got a page of system font question
marks. I was amused, but not encouraged... So I applied
at Wingspan Bank to see if their system worked any better
because it sure looks a lot prettier, but while they approved
me for a checking account, they disapproved of me for online
banking... Now-- is it really necessary to ask why I would
choose to use an online bank that won't let me bank online?
Humph.
----------------------------------------
18
October 1999
Victor
and I saturated ourselves with culture this weekend. We are
so oozing with art that we leave trails of slime like sophisticated
snails. For one thing, we went to Sensation
at the Brooklyn
Museum. It was amazing. It's first time I've seen Jenny
Saville's work in person (so to speak), and it is incredible...
Even more so than I imagined. I'd like to be an aesthetic
purist and not describe a work I admire in terms of the emotion
that it evokes in me, but standing in front of her Plan
was excruciating... In a different way than reading the captions
beneath the titles was. There were also some lovely paintings
by Damien Hirst that were actually more alarming to those
of us in compulsive pursuit of patterns, than any sliced up
cow. Ron Mueck's disturbing homunculus, Dead Dad, has
given me the most interesting sort of nightmares...
I'm
hungry for colours
and craving big
shapes (Vernor
Panton). I am going to go home and make something big
and colourful and solid... and maybe wet?
Blanking
by Tom Sherman (from allquiet.org--
thanks J). I say as I listen to an
editorial by Andre Codrescu, chat with Amy (who is a devastatingly
clever little beast-- said most admiringly) on IM and update
my Visio schematics. I gulp coffee, my foot shakes, and I
blink rapidly... I am heart-poundingly panicked by the idea
of a paucity of stimuli. Andrea and I discussed this once.
She told me about a retreat in the wilds of Connecticut or
somewhere where very focused people go to meditate
for three months. They may not speak or meet one another's
eyes or read or... anything at all. We were simultaneously
repelled and fascinated by the idea of retreating from the
world sans stimuli for such an amount of time. Actually, I
was mostly horrified. It reminds me too much of being stuck
on a plane for 10 hours on the runway without a book when
even the lame crossword in the airline magazine is filled
in... It reminds me of a Patience Lesson.
I
happily skip off to find out of what a gin
gimlet consists besides gin.
----------------------------------------
14
October 1999
It's
cold and bright and windy and I walked to work with my hand
shading my eyes. I walked past a man walking a small brown
bear or a large brown dog. I walked past a man sleeping in
front of my apartment, wrapped in a pink nightie. I walked
past a woman with long arms and legs and a delicate, white
face. I walked past a construction
worker smoking a joint and two men unloading produce.
They absentmindedly hooted and gestured at me. They made smacking
noises without losing the thread of their conversation...
I like people, but not in the way that prompts one to go into
a service industry. I like them in a less interactive way
than that... I've been screamed at a few times lately. It
doesn't happen often. Lately upon being made the target of
vociferous abuse, I am torn between a healthy outrage and
a slack-jawed fascination. I start to very properly protest,
murmuring words like inappropriate and unedifying
and enough...But then I am overcome with a sticky fascination...
I must admit it. I'm impressed. Probably not in the way I'm
supposed to be impressed... But impressed, nonetheless.
SMH's
Corning Museum of Glass.
----------------------------------------
13
October 1999
Sometimes
grad
school starts to sound like fun...
Although it seems that a lot of my friends are finding it
less stimulating than they expected. It seems as though the
more certian one is about one's direction or interests, the
less relevant it is... At least for studies that are not exclusively
technical.
The
Institute of Research and Cordination in Acoustics & Music.
----------------------------------------
12
October 1999
...Combatís
su resistencia
y luego, con gravedad,
decís que fue liviandad
lo que hizo la diligencia...
-Sor
Juana Inés de la Cruz
I
s'pose everybody wishes they could imitate other people's
styles-- of writing, design, etc.
----------------------------------------
11
October 1999
Saul
Bellow as one of the New York Times writers on writers
(which sounds a bit like a meat dish they might serve for
breakfast at the Waffle House on the interstate in Tennessee).
I
read a lot of books this rainy weekend: Hullabaloo
in the Guava Orchard, which made my mouth water; NP,
which was deceptively simple but left a persistent and
disturbing aftertaste; and four short novels of Stendhal,
the collection of which doesn't seem to be in print any longer.
The last were interesting especially in the distance implied
by the author. He encourages the reader to project himself
in identifying with the motivations of characters in stories
that took place some two hundred years before they were written
in 1830-ish(?). By doing so, he emphasizes the reader's distance
from the characters and settings (which seems to indicate
an attitude slightly contrary to that to which he lays claim
more explicitly, i.e. the French are missing something in
the absence of the stereotyped Latin passion about which revolve
the narratives). That in turn, emphasizes my distance from
the readers for whom he was writing. Identifying with the
characters is trying to see through a clouded glass of foreign
and inscrutable motivations... But then suddenly everything
becomes viciously lucid (e.g. two-thirds of the way through
The Abbess of Castro). I am reading about a twenty-seven
year old woman. She's depressed. She doesn't give a damn anymore...
And then I pick up NP (which, like all of Banana Yoshimoto's
work, might have been written by a friend; it is so little
removed from my world)...
Yipes.
The
Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing.
----------------------------------------
07
October 1999
What
Ume-the-Cat thinks about all day long. She always looks
so pensive and engaged. She maintains a very serious look
on her little pointed face...
----------------------------------------
06
October 1999
I
sit in a gigantic hotel bed on the 28th floor and watch TV
with the volume turned down. It's surreal-- especially the
commercials. A colossal mint leaf sails through an ambiguous
ether and dramatically severs a floating steel chain. A layered
textual world of anagrams advertises something or other--
oh, the New York Times. I am enthralled... TV's neat.
How
healthy. The Shopping Avenger effectively channels the
rage the rest of us bury deep within our subconscious where
it festers and takes years off our lives, while we smile tightly
and grind our teeth... Me, I've been doing a bit too much
flying lately to have faith in humankind.
The
"What
do people search for?" page, from the CHI list. It's
pure voyeurism disguised as research (or the other way 'round,
depending who you are). I can stop looking any time I want.
It's relevant research... And if you tell me all the juicy
details, I can pray more effectively for you.
----------------------------------------
05
October 1999
There
are some personal insults that are so calculated and manipulative
as to seem nothing more than... pathetic. Reminds me of a
boy I went out with a couple times in highschool. When it
became painfully evident that I was not as enthralled with
him as he was with himself he began to drop little joking
comments and making lots of sincere, sad observations ostensibly
to help me improve myself. He kindly informed me that my nose
is funny shaped and that I should probably try to lose some
weight and not talk so much. Even at the fragile age of sixteen
it didn't take long for me to find it all wildly amusing and,
I am sorry to say, be very mean to the poor kid. As a grown-up
I still find it howlingly funny, but my reaction has since
become tinged with that most sordid of sentiments-- pity.
The sticky ugliness of it all mostly prompts me to keep my
mouth shut and smile sweetly... Mostly.
Diagrams
of the Nuremberg race laws.
I
read Enduring
Love
on the plane yesterday. It was, like everything by Ian
McEwan, fine. Good, even. I've come to realize that I've lost
my taste for a certian type of narrative, though. The book,
though well written, seemed rigidly linear and formulaic to
me... I think the former makes all the more probable the latter...
An interview
with Dana
Atchley (warm
cool system).
Oh,
I'm working on the most delicious, the most succulently relevant
wide-ranging search functionality... It just makes my mouth
water. Words fail me.
----------------------------------------
03
October 1999
Steven
Pinker's book
should be called How I Think the Mind Works and Six Hundred
Other Pages of Words You Can Skip. It consists primarily
of decontextualized, misread references with which he constructs
a non-existent adversary / argument so that he can debunk
said non-existent points and make three or four hundred pages
of snide remarks at the expense of... someone. Certainly no
one referenced could take him seriously enough to be affronted
by his resolute misreadings. He Misses The Point with an impressive
and comforting degree of consistency. The chapters that consist
of random and unrelated information are the least outrageous
although they mostly don't have much to do with how the mind
works. I'm halfway through and I can't really see a compelling
reason to finish... Maybe if someone paid me... That was a
bit mean, I guess, but it is a pretty complacent work.
I'm
interested in both imposing patterns
on disparate pieces of information; and, of course, looking
for existing patterns.
However the former is more interesting in that it is, according
the the basis of the (empirical) scientific theory, taboo.
It involves manipulating one's data to fit a predefined pattern.
However, it can produce rare and beautiful results. For example,
imposing a grid will make vivid the shredded spots in the
woof and warp of a relationship otherwise taken for granted.
Change the data, impose the same grid and the meaning of the
relationship is entirely new.
----------------------------------------
September
|